Question and answer · informational

Do all owners have to sign a personal guarantee?

Usually everyone above a stated ownership percentage, and each signature is for the whole obligation rather than for a share of it.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Do all owners have to sign a personal guarantee?

Most funders require a guarantee from every owner at or above a stated percentage — 20% and 25% are both common, because they line up with SBA practice and with the customer due diligence rule's beneficial-owner definition. The percentage is the funder's policy, not a law. Guarantees are normally joint and several, meaning each guarantor is liable for the entire balance rather than their ownership share, and one owner refusing to sign is a structural blocker rather than a negotiating point.

The threshold, and where it comes from

Applications ask you to list owners at or above a percentage, and to have each of them sign. Twenty and twenty-five percent are the figures you will see most often.

Neither is a legal requirement for private funding. They are conventions that borrow from two places: SBA practice around who must guarantee a 7(a) loan, and the 25% beneficial-owner definition in the customer due diligence rule at 31 CFR 1010.230, which banks already apply for identification purposes. Individual funders set their own, and some require every owner regardless of size on smaller deals.

Signing the application is not signing the guarantee

Three different signatures get collected and they do different things.

The application and authorisation.Permits credit reports to be pulled and confirms the information given. Frequently signed by one owner or officer.
The corporate authority.A resolution or member consent confirming the entity approved the borrowing and naming who may bind it.
The guarantee.A separate contract in which an individual promises to pay if the business does not. This is the one that matters personally.

A minority owner is sometimes asked for a lesser document — a validity guarantee, which promises that the information and the receivables are genuine rather than promising payment, or an acknowledgement rather than a guarantee. Ask which one you are being handed, and read the operative sentence.

Joint and several is the part to understand

Guarantees are almost always joint and several. Four owners at 25% each do not each guarantee a quarter. Each guarantees all of it, and the holder can pursue whichever one is easiest to collect from for the entire balance.

Whatever you agree between yourselves about sharing the exposure is an agreement among owners. It does not bind the funder. If that matters to you, a written contribution agreement between the guarantors is the instrument, and it is worth having before anyone signs rather than after a default.

While you are reading, check whether the guarantee is a payment guarantee or a performance one — see MCA personal guarantee: performance versus payment.

Spouses

Regulation B generally prohibits requiring a spouse's signature where the applicant qualifies on their own for the amount and terms requested — the rule is at 12 CFR 1002.7, with exceptions for secured property and additional rules in community property states. It applies to credit, and whether a purchase of future receivables is credit for this purpose is not settled the way it is for a term loan.

If you are asked for a spousal signature and the business qualifies without it, ask why in writing.

When one owner will not sign

This is a structural problem rather than a negotiation, and there are only a few routes.

  1. Ask the funder to carve them out. Sometimes accepted where the refusing owner is passive and below a meaningful threshold, usually in exchange for a smaller amount or a higher price.
  2. Restructure ownership so the non-signer is genuinely below the threshold. Only if that reflects reality; a paper transfer to dodge a guarantee is a misrepresentation.
  3. Change product. Collateral-backed and receivable-backed products lean less on the guarantee than unsecured cash-flow products do.
  4. Accept a smaller facility that one guarantor's strength supports.

What joint and several means in dollars

Illustrative only —four owners hold 25% each and the balance owed after default is $200,000. The holder sues the one with a house and a brokerage account, takes judgment for the full $200,000, and collects it from that owner.

Nothing about that is unusual and nothing about it is wrong under the guarantee. The owner who paid is then left to pursue the other three for contribution — $50,000 each — as a separate matter, at their own cost, against people who may or may not have anything.

A contribution agreement signed at the start does not stop the holder doing this. What it does is settle in advance what the shares are, whether a non-paying owner also owes costs and interest, and what security the others give. Written before anyone is angry, it takes an afternoon. Written after a judgment, it usually is not written at all.

Four words in the operative sentence

Joint and several, or several only.A several guarantee limits each guarantor to a defined share. It is rare, and worth asking for on a larger facility.
Capped or unlimited.A cap can be a dollar amount, a share of the obligation, or a percentage tied to ownership. A cap that excludes interest, enforcement costs and attorney fees is not much of a cap on what you eventually pay.
Continuing or transaction-specific.A continuing guarantee covers future obligations to the same holder, including ones entered into after you stopped paying attention to that relationship.
Payment or performance.A payment guarantee promises to pay if the business does not. A performance guarantee promises that specified things will not happen — a change of bank, a second position, a diversion of receipts — which converts business covenants into personal claims.

Getting out later

Selling your stake does not release you. A release is a separate document signed by the holder, and it is negotiated rather than automatic.

If an exit is coming, deal with it inside the transaction rather than after it:

  1. List every guarantee you have signed, with the holder, the date and the obligation.
  2. Ask each holder in writing what it requires to release you — usually a replacement guarantor, a paydown, or both.
  3. Make the release, or an indemnity from the buyer backed by something real, a condition in the purchase agreement.
  4. Confirm in writing after closing that each release was actually executed, and keep the documents.

An indemnity from the buyer is not a release. It gives you a claim against the buyer and leaves the holder's claim against you exactly where it was.

Before anyone signs

  • Confirm the ownership table adds to 100% and matches the operating agreement.
  • Ask which threshold the funder applies.
  • Read whether the guarantee is limited in amount or unlimited, and whether it is continuing — a continuing guarantee covers future obligations too.
  • Check the termination language. Selling your stake later does not automatically release you.
  • Get a contribution agreement between guarantors in place.

See entity type and what it changes about a funding offer for how the wrapper affects who is liable before any guarantee is signed.

Where this applies

Related questions

Do all owners have to sign a personal guarantee?

Most funders require a guarantee from every owner at or above a stated percentage — 20% and 25% are both common, because they line up with SBA practice and with the customer due diligence rule's beneficial-owner definition. The percentage is the funder's policy, not a law. Guarantees are normally joint and several, meaning each guarantor is liable for the entire balance rather than their ownership share, and one owner refusing to sign is a structural blocker rather than a negotiating point.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, SBA Loan, Equipment Financing, Invoice Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading