Question and answer · informational

Do I need a CPA, or will a bookkeeper do?

They do different jobs, and the one that decides whether your application stalls is usually the cheaper one.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Do I need a CPA for a funding application, or will a bookkeeper do?

For most small-business funding, a competent bookkeeper doing a proper monthly close matters more than a CPA, because what stalls applications is unreconciled books, missing debt schedules and statements that do not tie — all bookkeeping work. A CPA becomes necessary for three things: filing returns for anything beyond the simplest structure, issuing a compiled, reviewed or audited report where a lender requires one, and the judgement calls a bookkeeper is not trained for, such as entity structure, accrual conversion and how to present add-backs. The common efficient arrangement is a bookkeeper doing the monthly close and a CPA reviewing quarterly and filing annually. Buy the close first.

The two roles get discussed as if one is a better version of the other. They are different jobs, and the job that determines whether your file stalls in underwriting is mostly the bookkeeper's.

What each one actually does

A bookkeeperrecords transactions, categorises them, reconciles accounts to statements, runs payroll, manages receivables and payables, and produces the monthly statements. This is the work that makes your numbers exist and makes them tie.
A CPAis licensed, which matters for three specific things: representing you before the IRS, issuing financial statements under professional standards with a report attached, and signing returns as a paid preparer under the obligations that carries. Beyond the licence, a CPA brings judgement about structure, tax position, and how a set of accounts should be presented.

There is no strict boundary in the middle. Plenty of CPAs do bookkeeping and plenty of experienced bookkeepers handle work that looks advisory. But the distinction above tells you what you are buying.

What actually stalls funding files

Go down the list of reasons an application takes three weeks instead of three days, and almost all of them are bookkeeping failures.

  • Cash on the balance sheet that does not agree with the bank statements.
  • A suspense or uncategorised account holding a real balance.
  • Loan and advance proceeds posted as income, which inflates revenue and hides liabilities.
  • Debt payments posted entirely as expense, so principal never reduces and the balance sheet shows obligations that do not exist or omits ones that do.
  • Owner draws sitting in expense accounts.
  • No debt schedule, or one that does not tie to the statements.
  • Interim statements that do not roll forward from the last filed return, usually because the accountant's year-end adjusting entries were never posted back into the bookkeeping file.
  • A balance sheet that does not balance.

Every item on that list is fixed by a monthly close done properly. None of them requires a licence.

That last one — unposted adjusting entries — is the clearest illustration of the division of labour. The CPA made the adjustments. The bookkeeper has to put them back into the live file, and when nobody does, every interim statement for the following year starts from a position the return does not recognise.

When you genuinely need a CPA

Returns beyond the simplest structure.Multi-member LLCs, S corporations, C corporations, multi-state activity, anything with a basis or distribution question. The return is the document a lender trusts most and the one you cannot revise to suit an application.
A report a lender has asked for.Compiled, reviewed or audited statements are engagements only a licensed accountant can perform, and they are three very different levels of work. If a term sheet requires one, find out in writing which level before commissioning anything, because the cost difference between them is substantial.
Judgement calls.Whether to convert to accrual and how to do it without breaking the comparative. How to present add-backs so they survive an analyst's scrutiny rather than costing you credibility. Whether related-party rent or owner compensation is defensible at its current level. Whether an entity restructure helps or creates a new time-in-business problem.
Anything contentious.An examination, a payment plan, a lien.

The arrangement that works

A bookkeeper doing the monthly close — all eight steps, including reconciliations, the debt schedule and the tie-outs. A CPA reviewing quarterly and filing annually, with the adjusting entries handed back and posted.

The quarterly review is the part people cut, and it is where the value sits. It catches a categorisation error at three months rather than at twelve, and it means the year-end adjustments are small rather than a restatement.

How to test the bookkeeper you have

Ask for four things and see what arrives.

  1. A reconciliation report for last month showing the adjusted book balance and the adjusted bank balance agreeing. Not a bank feed marked as matched — an actual reconciliation.
  2. The balance of every uncategorised, suspense and miscellaneous account. Should be zero.
  3. The current debt schedule, with balances as at a stated date.
  4. A one-line answer to how the last financing proceeds and repayments were posted. If the answer is that the deposit went to income and the payments to expense, you have found the problem.

A bookkeeper who produces all four without hesitation is doing the job. One who has to build them is doing data entry, which is a different service at a different price.

Doing it yourself

Plenty of owners keep their own books, and for a simple business it is workable. Two conditions.

The first is that you actually run the close, monthly, including the reconciliations and the tie-outs. Owner-kept books usually fail not on knowledge but on consistency: three months current, then a gap during a busy quarter, then a scramble.

The second is that you get someone to look at it periodically. The error you make in your own file is the one you will keep making, because nothing in the software objects. A quarterly review of a few hours from an accountant who knows what a lender reads catches the category error before it has been repeated forty times.

The point at which doing it yourself stops making sense is usually payroll, multi-state activity, inventory, or a second entity. Any of those introduces a class of decision where an error compounds quietly for a year.

What to do before your next application

Buy the close before you buy the report. A compiled financial statement sitting on top of unreconciled books is a tidy presentation of numbers that will not tie, and the analyst ties them to the bank statements regardless of who formatted them.

If your books are behind, the sequence is: catch up the bookkeeping, reconcile every month, post the CPA's prior-year adjustments, build the debt schedule, run the three tie-outs, and only then ask whether a CPA report adds anything. In most small-business files, by that point, it does not.

Where this applies

Related questions

Do I need a CPA for a funding application, or will a bookkeeper do?

For most small-business funding, a competent bookkeeper doing a proper monthly close matters more than a CPA, because what stalls applications is unreconciled books, missing debt schedules and statements that do not tie — all bookkeeping work. A CPA becomes necessary for three things: filing returns for anything beyond the simplest structure, issuing a compiled, reviewed or audited report where a lender requires one, and the judgement calls a bookkeeper is not trained for, such as entity structure, accrual conversion and how to present add-backs. The common efficient arrangement is a bookkeeper doing the monthly close and a CPA reviewing quarterly and filing annually. Buy the close first.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, SBA Loan, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading