Question and answer · informational

Field exams and appraisals: who pays, and how often

You pay, on a per-day basis plus expenses, and the frequency is written into the agreement with a right for the lender to come more often when it is worried.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Who pays for field exams and appraisals on an asset-based loan, and how often do they happen?

The borrower pays for field exams and collateral appraisals, normally at a per-diem rate plus travel expenses, and the obligation is written into the credit agreement. Frequency is stated as a minimum per year, with the lender free to order more when availability falls, results are poor or a default exists. Negotiate an annual cap on cost and number of exams while the facility is performing, and ask for a copy of the report you paid for.

A field exam is an audit of your collateral and the systems that report it. An appraisal is a valuation of inventory, equipment or real estate by a third party. Both are conditions of an asset-based facility, and both are billed to you.

What a field exam actually looks at

An examiner spends a few days in your office and tests whether the numbers you report can be relied on. That typically means:

  • Tying the receivable aging to the general ledger and to the borrowing base certificates you submitted.
  • Confirming a sample of invoices against purchase orders, delivery documents and cash receipts.
  • Measuring dilution — credit notes, discounts, short payments and returns as a share of sales.
  • Reviewing customer concentration and payment patterns.
  • Testing inventory counts, costing method and slow-moving stock.
  • Reviewing payables for anything past due that suggests a reserve, plus payroll tax and sales tax filings.
  • Looking at controls: who can raise a credit note, who applies cash, whether anything is manual.

The examiner is not looking for fraud so much as for the gap between your reporting and reality. What the exam finds drives advance rates and reserves, which is why it deserves preparation.

Who pays and how much

You do. The agreement will say so, usually as a per-diem rate per examiner per day plus travel and out-of-pocket costs, invoiced after the visit or charged directly to the loan. Appraisals are quoted per engagement by an outside firm.

Two things are worth negotiating at closing: an annual cap on the number of exams and total cost while no default exists, and confirmation that the cap comes off only on an event of default or below a stated availability level. Without a cap, the cost of monitoring rises exactly when your ability to absorb it falls.

What it costs, in the shape it is billed

Illustrative only —an examiner at a per-diem of $1,400, three days on site, plus $1,800 of travel and out-of-pocket costs. One exam is $6,000. Two performing-facility exams a year is $12,000, before any appraisal.

Appraisals are quoted per engagement rather than per diem, and the cost depends on the collateral. Inventory is commonly appraised on a net orderly liquidation value basis, which is a different exercise from an insurance or book valuation and is priced accordingly.

The figure to care about is not the individual invoice. It is the annual total in a bad year: without a cap, a facility under stress can carry quarterly exams and a fresh inventory appraisal in the same twelve months, all charged to a borrower who is already short of cash.

How often

The agreement will state a minimum, commonly once or twice a year for a performing facility, with additional exams at the lender's discretion. Appraisal frequency depends on the collateral: inventory tends to be revalued more often than equipment. Expect more of everything if availability tightens, if dilution rises, or if a certificate cannot be reconciled.

What the findings actually change

An exam is not pass or fail. It produces adjustments, and the adjustments have arithmetic behind them.

Illustrative only —eligible receivables of $2,020,000 after ineligibles. At an 85% advance rate that supports $1,717,000 of availability. The exam measures dilution higher than the file assumed and the advance rate moves to 80%. Availability falls to $1,616,000 — $101,000 less, from a five-point change in one number, with no change in your sales at all.

The other common outcomes:

  • A new reserve. Unpaid rent at a location without a landlord waiver, accrued payroll taxes, an unresolved customer dispute, expected credit notes. Each comes straight off availability.
  • A tighter eligibility definition. An aging cut-off moved from 90 days to 60, or a concentration limit lowered, can remove more availability than an advance-rate change does.
  • More frequent reporting. Monthly certificates become weekly, which costs staff time rather than money.
  • An earlier next exam. The clearest signal that the lender did not like what it saw.

The findings that cause the most trouble

Unapplied cash.Payments received and not posted to specific invoices make the aging unreliable, and an unreliable aging is the fastest route to a reserve.
Credit notes raised after month end.If credits are consistently issued in the following period, dilution has been understated in every certificate you have filed.
Invoices raised before shipment.Billing on order rather than on delivery puts ineligible invoices in the base, and once an examiner finds one they sample for more.
Payroll and sales tax arrears.Trust-fund taxes generate a reserve almost automatically, and the reserve is usually the full arrears rather than a percentage of it.
Two systems that do not agree.An aging from one system, a ledger from another, reconciled by hand each month, is a finding in its own right.

How to prepare

Reconcile the aging to the ledger before the examiner arrives. Have proof of delivery ready for a sample of large invoices. Clear unapplied cash. Know your dilution number before someone else calculates it. Make sure payroll and sales tax filings are current, because unpaid trust-fund taxes generate reserves quickly.

Ask for the report

You paid for it. A copy tells you exactly which findings are behind the next reserve or advance rate change, and gives you something specific to fix before the following visit.

What else to negotiate at closing

The annual cap above is the main one. Three more are worth asking for in the same conversation, and none of them is available on ordinary terms once the facility is live.

  • The per-diem rate written into the agreement, rather than left to whatever the exam group charges at the time.
  • Notice before an exam, so the people who have to produce the records are not away that week.
  • A stated period before an advance-rate change or a new reserve takes effect, so a finding does not become a paydown demand in the same week it is delivered.

The pattern across all of them is the same. Monitoring cost and monitoring consequence both rise exactly when your ability to absorb them falls, and the only moment you can do anything about that is while the lender still wants the deal.

Where this applies

Related questions

Who pays for field exams and appraisals on an asset-based loan, and how often do they happen?

The borrower pays for field exams and collateral appraisals, normally at a per-diem rate plus travel expenses, and the obligation is written into the credit agreement. Frequency is stated as a minimum per year, with the lender free to order more when availability falls, results are poor or a default exists. Negotiate an annual cap on cost and number of exams while the facility is performing, and ask for a copy of the report you paid for.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Invoice Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading