Question and answer · informational

How do business loan brokers get paid?

Four structures, sometimes combined. Only two of them appear anywhere on your paperwork.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

How do business funding brokers get paid?

Compensation comes in four shapes: a commission paid by the funder out of its margin, a fee deducted from your proceeds, a spread added on top of the price the funder quoted the broker, or some combination. In every version the money originates with you; the only variable is whether you can see it. There is no reliable typical percentage — it varies by funder, product, size and negotiation — so ask for your own number in writing rather than relying on a market figure.

The four structures

Commission from the funder.The funder pays the originating office a percentage of the amount funded, out of its own margin, at funding. Nothing appears on your documents.
A fee deducted from your proceeds.A stated broker or packaging fee taken out of the wire. Visible, and it reduces the money you actually receive while leaving the amount you repay unchanged.
A spread over the buy rate.The funder approves the deal at one price and permits the broker to present a higher one — the sell rate — keeping the difference. This never appears as a fee. It appears as your cost of money.
Renewal and residual arrangements.Compensation when you come back for more, which is one reason the "additional capital" call tends to arrive at the point in your balance where a renewal is most profitable to write.

Why there is no typical percentage here

Anyone quoting you a standard market rate for broker compensation is guessing. It varies by funder, by product, by deal size, by the broker's volume relationship and by what was negotiated on the day. Rather than benchmark against an invented figure, get the actual one:

How are you compensated on this specific deal, by whom, and how much? Is the price you have quoted me the funder's price, or does it include a spread you added?

Ask in writing. A direct answer is a good sign. A refusal is not automatically misconduct, but it is information, and you can weigh it against the offer.

What the structure does to the advice you are given

Commission on funded amount means the person advising you is paid more when you take more. Not when you take the right amount, and not when you choose the cheapest structure available. That does not make anyone dishonest; it means the incentive points one way and you should hold that in mind whenever the suggested amount is larger than the amount you asked for.

Where it shows up in cost

Both visible fees and invisible spreads are paid out of your deal, and both raise the real cost of the money you receive. The arithmetic of how a spread plus points changes an effective cost is worked through in who pays the broker's points.

What a spread costs, worked

Illustrative only —an $80,000 advance. The funder approves it at a buy rate of 1.24, meaning it would take $99,200. The broker presents 1.32, a sell rate producing $105,600. The $6,400 difference is the broker's compensation, and it is 8% of the advance.

Now add a 3% packaging fee taken out of the wire. You receive $77,600 and you repay $105,600. Your cost is $28,000, or 36.1 cents for every dollar that reached your account.

At the funder's own price with no fee, the cost would have been 24 cents per dollar. The intermediation added just over twelve cents per dollar of cash received, and none of it appears on any document as a broker charge. One line of it is disclosed as a fee. The larger line is simply your price.

That arithmetic is the reason the buy-rate question is worth asking directly, and it is why an answer of "the funder pays me, it costs you nothing" deserves a follow-up: does the funder's approval permit you to present a higher rate than the one it approved, and did you.

What is not normal

Payment before funding. Legitimate compensation in this market is paid out of the transaction when it closes. An upfront "processing fee", "commitment deposit" or "underwriting retainer" paid to an intermediary in exchange for a promise of funding is the standard shape of an advance-fee scam; the FTC publishes material on the pattern at ftc.gov.

Genuine third-party costs do exist on larger deals — an appraisal, a field exam, a search fee — and they are payable to the firm performing the work, documented, and normally arranged after a written term sheet rather than before anyone has looked at your file.

How to tell what kind of intermediary you are dealing with

Titles mean nothing in this market. Behaviour separates the categories quickly.

The submission desk.Takes your file, sends it to a panel, comes back with whatever prints. Volume is the business model, so the file goes everywhere at once. The tell is speed combined with vagueness — offers arrive within hours and nobody can say which funder produced which one, or why.
The placement broker.Knows a smaller set of funders well, asks what the money is for before asking how much, and can explain why a particular funder suits your file. The tell is that they decline to submit somewhere, and say why.
The reseller who is actually the funder.Some funders originate under trade names. Asking "are you the party whose money this is" is a fair question with a one-word answer.

Three things worth watching for in any of them. A file submitted to a dozen funders at once leaves a trail of inquiries and shared-database entries that makes you look like a business shopping in distress. An offer that arrives larger than you asked for is an incentive at work. And a call proposing more capital while you already carry a position is a proposal that you breach your existing contract, whatever it is called.

Read the broker agreement

Before you sign one, look for exclusivity, a fee payable even if you fund elsewhere within a period, open-ended authorisation to submit your file to unnamed "partners", and what happens to your documents and your contact details afterwards. Those clauses cost more than the commission does.

Two of those deserve naming. An exclusivity clause with a tail period means a funder you found yourself, months later, can still generate a commission. And an open authorisation to submit your file to unnamed partners is how one application becomes fifteen inquiries, a run of shared-database entries and a phone that does not stop for a year.

Ask for both to be limited: a named list of funders, and your written approval before any further submission. A broker who works with a small panel agrees to that without hesitation, because it describes what they were going to do anyway.

Where this applies

Related questions

How do business funding brokers get paid?

Compensation comes in four shapes: a commission paid by the funder out of its margin, a fee deducted from your proceeds, a spread added on top of the price the funder quoted the broker, or some combination. In every version the money originates with you; the only variable is whether you can see it. There is no reliable typical percentage — it varies by funder, product, size and negotiation — so ask for your own number in writing rather than relying on a market figure.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, Equipment Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading