Question and answer · informational

What is a soft credit pull, and when does it become a hard one?

An inquiry other lenders cannot see and your score does not feel — which is useful, and is also not the same thing as an offer.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

What is a soft pull?

A soft pull is a review of your credit file that is not visible to other lenders and does not affect your score; a hard pull is tied to a specific credit decision, appears on your report for two years, and is weighed by scoring models for about twelve months. The terms are industry conventions rather than statutory ones — the Fair Credit Reporting Act deals in permissible purpose, not in soft and hard. A soft-pull prequalification is an indication, not a commitment.

The difference

Soft pull.A review of your file that is recorded for you but not shown to other lenders on the reports they buy, and not used by scoring models. It happens at prequalification, on account reviews by lenders you already have, on prescreened offers, and when you check your own credit.
Hard pull.An inquiry tied to a specific application for credit that you authorised. It is disclosed to other lenders, stays on your consumer report for two years, and is generally weighed by FICO scoring models for twelve months. The deduction for one is small; a cluster is read as a pattern.

The terms are not in the statute

Worth knowing, because it explains why nobody can point you to the rule. The Fair Credit Reporting Act does not say "soft" or "hard". What it says is that a consumer report may be obtained only for a permissible purpose (15 U.S.C. §1681b), and that inquiries must be disclosed to you when you request your own file (15 U.S.C. §1681g).

Whether an inquiry is shown to other lenders and whether scoring models count it are bureau and model conventions built on top of that. They are stable conventions, but they are conventions, and they are why "soft pull" means slightly different things to different parties.

Where the promise breaks

A funder saying "this is only a soft pull" is usually describing the first step. The authorisation you sign frequently permits more than the first step. Look for language permitting the applicant's consumer report to be obtained by the funder, its affiliates, its assignees, and any funding source the application is submitted to, from time to time.

Under that wording, one signature can produce a soft pull today, a hard pull at offer stage, and additional pulls by other funders the file was distributed to. If a broker is involved, ask how many funders receive it. See how many funding applications is too many.

Soft pull is not preapproval, and preapproval is not an offer

A soft-pull prequalification is a screen against a funder's basic criteria. It tells you the file is worth working. It does not commit anyone to anything, and the terms shown at that stage routinely change once the statements are read and the stips come back.

The things that move a prequalified number: adjusted deposits after transfers are stripped, existing positions found in the debit column, negative days, and anything on the UCC index. See what an underwriter reads in three months of bank statements.

Shopping does not get you a grace window here

Consumer scoring models treat a cluster of inquiries for a single mortgage or auto loan as one event, because a consumer shopping one purchase should not be punished for comparing. That de-duplication is specific to certain consumer loan types.

Business credit applications, and business credit card applications in particular, are generally not covered by it. Six funders pulling your personal credit over ten days can register as six separate inquiries rather than one shopping event. That is the practical reason to control how widely a broker distributes your file, and the reason question three below is worth asking before you sign an authorisation rather than after.

The defence is sequencing. Get the soft-pull prequalification and the bank statement review done first, narrow to one or two funders on the terms and the structure, and let the hard pull happen once. A file shopped to nine funders arrives at the tenth looking like a business that nine funders have already considered.

Finding out who pulled you

You are entitled to your consumer reports and the inquiry list on them, and the inquiry section is the record of who looked and when. Request them through the official annual disclosure channel rather than a marketing site — the CFPB explains how — and read the inquiry section rather than only the score.

What you are checking for: pulls by companies you do not recognise, pulls dated after you withdrew an application, and pulls by multiple funders where you authorised one. Names on the list will not always match the brand you dealt with, because funders operate under legal entity names, so search the unfamiliar ones before assuming the worst.

If a pull happened you did not authorise

A consumer report may only be obtained for a permissible purpose. If you believe one was pulled without one, you have a process:

  1. Write to the company that made the inquiry and ask on what basis and under which authorisation it obtained your report.
  2. Dispute the inquiry with the bureau that reported it, in writing, keeping the correspondence.
  3. If it is not resolved, the CFPB takes complaints about credit reporting and about the companies that furnish and obtain reports.

Keep the authorisation you signed. Most disputes of this kind end with the funder producing broad language you agreed to, and knowing in advance whether that language exists tells you whether the complaint is worth making.

The business-file side

Inquiries on your commercial credit file are recorded too, and the consumer protections do not follow. There is no statutory right to a free copy of a business credit report and no statutory dispute timeline, because the Fair Credit Reporting Act governs consumer reports rather than reports on a business entity. What a commercial bureau records about who looked at you, and for how long, is its own policy.

So the practical protection is knowing what is in the file before a lender does. Ask each commercial bureau directly what it holds on your business and what it costs to see it, correct anything wrong, and repeat that annually rather than at the point you need credit.

What to ask

  1. Is the initial review soft or hard?
  2. At what point does a hard pull happen, and will you tell me first?
  3. How many funders will receive this application?
  4. Does the authorisation permit pulls by anyone other than you?

Four questions, answerable in a sentence each. A funder that will not answer them in writing has told you something about how the rest of the process will go.

Where this applies

Related questions

What is a soft pull?

A soft pull is a review of your credit file that is not visible to other lenders and does not affect your score; a hard pull is tied to a specific credit decision, appears on your report for two years, and is weighed by scoring models for about twelve months. The terms are industry conventions rather than statutory ones — the Fair Credit Reporting Act deals in permissible purpose, not in soft and hard. A soft-pull prequalification is an indication, not a commitment.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, Equipment Financing, Business Credit Cards. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading