What “no interest” actually means in an advance pitch
It is accurate as a description of the paperwork and useless as a description of the price. Here is how to move the conversation back to money.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
A broker told me a merchant cash advance has no interest. Is that true?
It is technically accurate and economically misleading. The agreement states no interest rate, because it is drafted as a purchase of receivables rather than a loan, and the cost is a fixed dollar difference set at signing instead of a rate that accrues. That does not make it inexpensive, and it does not make it comparable to a quoted rate elsewhere. Ask for the cost in dollars and the expected number of business days, and compare on that.
Why the claim is literally true
The document does not contain an interest rate. It is written as a purchase of future receipts, and what you pay is the difference between the purchased amount and the purchase price — a number fixed the day you sign that does not accrue, compound or change with time.
So when a broker says there is no interest, they are describing the contract accurately.
Why it tells you nothing about price
"No interest" is a statement about the mechanism of the charge, not its size. A fixed dollar cost can be cheaper or far more expensive than an interest-bearing facility. What decides it is how much and over how long — and the second half of that is precisely what the phrase omits.
Worse, the absence of a rate can make the deal feel closer to free than a facility that quotes one. A line of credit quoting a rate sounds like it costs money. An advance with "no interest" and "one simple fixed cost" does not, right up until the debits start.
The other things "no interest" is doing
It sidesteps comparison. You cannot set "no interest" against a quoted rate, which means the conversation stops being about price.
It borrows the credibility of a genuine legal point. The purchase framing is real and it has real consequences — for reconciliation, for what happens if the business fails, for how a court might look at the agreement. Using it as a selling point about affordability is a different move entirely.
And it sits close to two claims that regulators have taken an interest in. The Federal Trade Commission has brought enforcement actions in the small business financing market under Section 5 of the FTC Act concerning how advances were marketed and collected, including statements about personal guarantees and about the amount a business would receive. If a pitch is making the deal sound obligation-free, that is a signal to slow down, not to sign. The FTC publishes its actions and business guidance.
Three claims that travel with it
How to answer it in the room
Do not argue about whether it is interest. Ask four questions instead:
- What is the exact dollar amount that will hit my bank account?
- What is the total dollar amount I will deliver, including every fee charged along the way?
- What is the remittance amount, and how often?
- How many business days does that imply?
Those four answers give you cost in dollars and cost per month, which is what you needed. If you want a rate for comparison, you can compute one afterwards — but only by fixing the term and stating it, since the contract does not supply one.
A broker who answers all four in writing is being straight with you. A broker who returns to "there's no interest, it's just one flat cost" has told you they would rather you did not do the arithmetic.
Turning the four answers into a price
The cost is $36,000, which is 37.5 cents per dollar of cash received. That figure needs no convention and no assumption, and it is the one to write down first.
$132,000 at $1,100 a day is 120 banking days, about 5.7 months, and $23,100 a month of outflow. Now you have the two numbers that decide things: what it costs, and what it demands each month.
If you want a rate you have to supply the term, and you have to say so. Solving for the daily rate that makes 120 payments of $1,100 equal $96,000 today gives 0.5586%, and multiplying by 252 banking days gives roughly 141% annualised.
Run it again at a longer duration to see how much of that figure is the clock rather than the cost. Stretch the same $132,000 across nine months — 189 banking days at $698.41 a day — and the same dollars annualise to about 90%. The cost never moved. That is exactly why "no interest" cannot be compared to anything until somebody writes down the term.
Two more questions, while you are asking
The four above give you the price. Two more give you the risk, and they cost nothing to add to the same message.
Add one that usually gets a no, because the answer matters to the arithmetic: is there any discount for paying early? On a fixed-cost product there is often none, and that changes what a short expected term is actually worth to you.
Where this applies
Related questions
A broker told me a merchant cash advance has no interest. Is that true?
It is technically accurate and economically misleading. The agreement states no interest rate, because it is drafted as a purchase of receivables rather than a loan, and the cost is a fixed dollar difference set at signing instead of a rate that accrues. That does not make it inexpensive, and it does not make it comparable to a quoted rate elsewhere. Ask for the cost in dollars and the expected number of business days, and compare on that.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Merchant Cash Advance. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Are the figures here quotes?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.