Question and answer · informational

Why did my business line of credit get cut?

Start by finding out which of four things happened, because the response to a borrowing base recalculation is nothing like the response to a covenant breach.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Why did my business line of credit get cut or reduced?

A line is usually reduced for one of four reasons: an availability formula recalculated to a lower number, a covenant or reporting requirement was missed, a scheduled review or renewal produced a new credit decision, or the lender made a portfolio-level change unrelated to your file. Ask the lender in writing which one it was, and check whether the outstanding balance is now above the new limit, since that usually triggers an immediate paydown obligation. Under Regulation B you may be entitled to the reasons, sometimes only on request and within a deadline.

Four things could have happened, and the response differs completely. Establish which one before you do anything else.

A formula recalculated.If availability is set by a borrowing base rather than a fixed limit, nobody made a decision — the calculation ran and produced a lower number. Receivables aged past 90 days, one customer exceeded a concentration limit, inventory was written down. This is the most common cause and the easiest to address, because the inputs are yours.
A covenant or reporting requirement was missed.Financial statements delivered late, a covenant certificate not filed, a coverage or debt-to-EBITDA test failed, or an annual clean-up requirement not met. Many of these are technical rather than substantive, and many are curable.
A scheduled review or renewal.Most lines are committed for twelve months and re-underwritten. At renewal the lender takes a fresh view of a fresh year, and resizing is one of the normal outcomes.
A portfolio decision.Industry concentration limits, a change in credit appetite, a merger of two credit policies. Nothing in your file changed. These are the least satisfying and the hardest to argue with.

The first two things to check

Whether you are now over the limit.If the outstanding balance exceeds the new availability, most agreements require immediate repayment of the excess. Find that clause and find out how many days you have. This is urgent in a way the rest of it is not.
What else the reduction triggers.A cut line can affect a covenant measured on liquidity or availability, and some agreements cross-default. Read the facility document before the next conversation, not after it.

What to ask the lender, in writing

  1. What specifically caused the reduction?
  2. Is it a formula outcome, a covenant issue, a renewal decision, or a portfolio change?
  3. If it is curable, what exactly would restore availability, and by when?
  4. Is the outstanding balance now over the limit, and what is the required paydown and deadline?
  5. Is the facility still committed, or has it moved to a demand or discretionary basis?

Put it in an email. A written question produces a written answer you can act on, and it starts a record.

A borrowing base reduction, worked

Illustrative only —a facility with a $600,000 limit against 85% of eligible receivables, currently drawn $380,000.

Last month the ledger was $1,310,000 with $60,000 excluded, giving $1,250,000 eligible and availability of $1,062,500 — well above the limit, so the $600,000 cap was the binding constraint and nobody thought about the formula.

This month two things happened. $180,000 of invoices aged past 90 days, and one customer went over the concentration cap by $95,000. Eligible receivables fall to $975,000 and availability to $828,750. Still above the limit. Nothing visible changes.

Then a $300,000 customer disputes a delivery and its whole balance is made ineligible under the cross-aging rule. Eligible falls to $675,000, availability to $573,750, and for the first time the formula is below the limit. Your available line is now $573,750, not $600,000, and if you had been drawn at $590,000 you would be over it.

Two lessons sit in that sequence. The formula was moving for months before anything appeared on a statement, because the limit was masking it. And the move that finally bit was a single customer, not a general decline — which is why concentration is the thing to watch rather than the total.

Ask for the borrowing base certificate the lender used, line by line, and reconcile it against your own ageing. Errors happen: an invoice miscoded as aged, a credit note applied twice, a customer counted as one obligor when it is two.

Your notification rights

Under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B, adverse action includes termination of an account or an unfavourable change in its terms — with an exception where the change affects all or substantially all of a class of the creditor's accounts, which is precisely what a portfolio-level reduction may be. Business credit has its own notification rules that vary with the applicant's revenue, and in some cases reasons must be provided only on request made within a set period. See 12 CFR 1002.9 and the definitions at 12 CFR 1002.2. Ask promptly rather than waiting.

What to do in the first week, in order

  1. Get the new availability figure and the calculation behind it in writing. Not the number over the phone — the certificate or the schedule.
  2. Check the outstanding balance against it. If you are over, find the paydown clause and the deadline before doing anything else.
  3. Reconcile the calculation. Against your own ageing, line by line, including which customers were treated as concentrated and which invoices as aged.
  4. Ask the four questions above by email, so the answers are written and dated.
  5. Model the next sixty days of cash on the new availability, not on the old one. This is the step people skip, and it is the one that determines whether you have a problem next month or next quarter.
  6. Start the conversation with a second institution. Before you need it, while your financials still look like the ones you would want to present.

What tends to prevent the next one

Reporting on time, every time. Late statements are the cheapest reason to lose availability and the most common.

Ageing discipline. A ledger managed for collection is a ledger that produces availability, and the two are the same work. Chase at 40 days rather than 80, and resolve disputes rather than letting the invoice sit while it ages out of eligibility.

Concentration awareness. Know which customer is your largest share of the ledger and what the cap is, and treat crossing it as a financing event rather than a sales success.

A standing quarterly conversation with the lender, with numbers attached. Relationships that only produce contact when something is wrong get reviewed differently from relationships that produce a short, accurate update every quarter. That is not sentiment; it is that the credit file of a borrower who reports consistently contains fewer unknowns, and unknowns are what reductions are made out of.

Fixing what is fixable

If it was the borrowing base: collect the aged invoices, resolve disputes, and address concentration. Availability moves with the ledger, so improving the ledger restores it.

If it was reporting: deliver everything outstanding immediately and set calendar reminders for the year. Reporting defaults are the cheapest defaults to cure and the most careless to incur.

If it was a covenant test: ask whether a waiver is available for the period and what the lender would want in exchange. Waivers are routine transactions and are usually easier to obtain before the breach than after.

If it was a renewal or portfolio decision: the useful work is elsewhere. Start a conversation with a second institution now, while you are not under pressure, and build the file — current financials, clean statements, a complete debt schedule — before you need it. The best time to arrange a line is when you do not need one, which is also the only reliable protection against this happening again.

Where this applies

Related questions

Why did my business line of credit get cut or reduced?

A line is usually reduced for one of four reasons: an availability formula recalculated to a lower number, a covenant or reporting requirement was missed, a scheduled review or renewal produced a new credit decision, or the lender made a portfolio-level change unrelated to your file. Ask the lender in writing which one it was, and check whether the outstanding balance is now above the new limit, since that usually triggers an immediate paydown obligation. Under Regulation B you may be entitled to the reasons, sometimes only on request and within a deadline.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Business Line of Credit, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading