The A/R and A/P ageing reports, and what a lender reads out of them
Two reports you already have. One decides how much you can borrow against your invoices; the other tells a stranger how tight things are.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
An ageing report is a list of open invoices bucketed by how long they have been outstanding — current, 1-30 days past due, 31-60, 61-90, over 90. Receivables on one, payables on the other. Any accounting system produces both in a few clicks. That is why lenders ask for them, and it is why an ageing that arrives late or looks hand-built is itself a signal.
What the receivables ageing decides
For invoice factoring, asset-based lending and revolving facilities, the A/R ageing is not background — it is the collateral, and the report is the instrument that sizes the facility.
Take the gross ledger, remove the ineligibles, apply the concentration cap, apply the advance rate. What is left is availability. It is usually a good deal less than the ledger total, and knowing this before you apply prevents the most common disappointment in receivables finance.
The availability calculation, worked
Your largest customer owes $310,000, of which $20,000 sat in the over-90 bucket you just removed, so $290,000 remains. Apply a 25% concentration cap against the $745,000 pool: $186,250 is the most that one customer can contribute, so $103,750 comes out. Eligible collateral is $641,250.
At an 80% advance rate, availability is $513,000 — about 61 cents for every dollar on the ledger.
Now run the cross-aging case on the same numbers. Suppose next quarter more than half of that customer's balance ages past the limit. The whole $290,000 goes ineligible, not just the aged part. Eligible falls to $455,000 and availability to $364,000. One slow customer removed $149,000 of borrowing capacity, and nothing about your sales changed.
Every percentage above is a placeholder. Ask the funder for its own age limit, concentration cap and advance rate, then rebuild the calculation with those figures before you sign.
What the payables ageing tells them
The A/P ageing is not collateral. It is a portrait of how you are managing pressure, and the analyst reads it in a specific order:
- Anything past 90 days. Who is being stretched, and can they stop supplying you.
- Tax authorities and payroll obligations. These outrank the lender in more ways than one and their presence in a stretched bucket changes the whole assessment.
- A single dominant supplier. If one vendor can shut you down and is being paid slowly, the lender is looking at operational risk, not just credit risk.
- The relationship between A/P days and A/R days. Collecting in 55 days while paying in 25 explains why you need working capital, and it makes the ask coherent. Collecting in 30 and paying in 90 with no cash raises a different question.
How to produce reports that hold up
Where the ageing misleads, and what to say about it
The version to run for yourself
Before you apply for anything receivables-based, build the availability calculation yourself. List the ledger. Strike out everything over 90 days. Strike out the disputed and the related-party items. Apply a concentration limit to your largest customer. Look at the number that remains and ask whether it funds the gap you are trying to close.
If it does not, receivables finance is not the answer to this particular problem, and you have saved yourself a submission, a set of documents and a field exam to find that out.
Where this applies
Related questions
What does this guide cover?
Two reports you already have. One decides how much you can borrow against your invoices; the other tells a stranger how tight things are.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Working Capital, Business Line of Credit, Invoice Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Are the figures here quotes?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.