Guide · informational

Borrowing in your first year after buying the business

The acquisition debt is on the schedule, the seller's add-backs are being tested against reality, and you have no track record of your own yet.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

You bought a business with a history and you have none. That is the position, and it shapes every financing conversation for about eighteen months. The seller's numbers got the acquisition financed. They will not get the next facility financed, because the lender is now underwriting a company with a new operator, a new cost structure and a large new debt service line that did not exist in any of the historical years.

The calculation that decides your first year

Illustrative only —the business was presented at 320,000 of adjusted EBITDA. Your acquisition financing carries 168,000 of annual debt service. You now want a 48,000-a-year facility for working capital.

On the numbers as presented: 320,000 ÷ (168,000 + 48,000) = 1.48. That looks like an approvable file.

Now test the adjustments that do not survive the change of ownership:

  • The seller's compensation gap. The seller took 60,000 and worked four days a week because the business was paid for. You need 105,000 to live and you are running it full time. The add-back that assumed the owner's salary could be removed is overstated by 45,000.
  • One-off items that turn out not to be one-off. A 12,000 "non-recurring" legal cost that recurs, because it was the annual cost of a dispute the business genuinely has.

Normalised EBITDA: 320,000 − 45,000 − 12,000 = 263,000. Coverage becomes 263,000 ÷ 216,000 = 1.22.

If the lender's floor is 1.25, the maximum total annual debt service it will support is 263,000 ÷ 1.25 = 210,400. Less the 168,000 of acquisition debt, that leaves 42,400 for the new facility — against the 48,000 you asked for. You are 5,600 a year over, which is a smaller request or a longer term, not a decline.

Do this calculation before you apply. It converts a rejection into a correctly sized request.

The four things a lender will test in year one

The add-backs.Every adjustment in the acquisition model gets re-examined against what actually happened. Keep the original quality-of-earnings or adjustment schedule and mark it up honestly: which adjustments held, which did not, and why. Presenting that yourself is far stronger than having it discovered.
Customer retention.The single largest risk in an acquisition is that customers were loyal to the seller. Have the numbers: customers at close, customers now, revenue from the top ten then and now. If you have lost some, say which and why, and what replaced them.
Key person dependency.If the seller held the relationships, the licence, the technical knowledge or the supplier terms, what happened when they left? A transition agreement that has already expired is a risk that has already been taken; a seller still on a consulting arrangement is a dependency that has not yet been tested.
Whether the seller note is genuinely on standby.If part of the purchase price is a seller note, its treatment matters enormously to your coverage. A note formally subordinated and on full standby — no payments while the senior debt is outstanding — can be excluded from debt service. A note being paid monthly cannot. Find the subordination agreement and read what it actually says, because owners frequently believe theirs is on standby when it merely ranks behind.

What you have that a start-up does not

Do not undersell the position. You have historical financial statements, an existing customer base, an operating history for the business even if not for you, and a set of tax returns. That is a substantially better file than a new business, and the products available to you are correspondingly better.

What you lack is your own record. Twelve months of statements under your ownership, showing the business performing at or above the level you bought it at, is the single most valuable document you can produce. Everything gets easier once it exists, which is a reason to plan any non-urgent borrowing for month thirteen rather than month four.

The first-year document set

  • The purchase agreement, the closing statement, and the allocation of purchase price.
  • The acquisition loan documents, including every covenant. Read the negative covenants specifically: most acquisition financings restrict additional indebtedness, and taking a facility that breaches that clause is a default on the loan that bought the business. Check before you apply, not after you sign.
  • The seller note and its subordination agreement, if one exists.
  • Historical financials for three years, plus your period since close, presented on the same basis so they can be compared.
  • A customer schedule, then and now.
  • Your own debt schedule, with the acquisition debt on it correctly.
  • Any earn-out or contingent payment obligations. These are debt for underwriting purposes even when the accounting treats them otherwise.

The covenant point, restated because it is the one that bites

Most acquisition loans contain a clause limiting additional debt and often limiting liens. A working capital facility from a different funder, secured by a UCC filing on your receivables, can breach both. The consequences are not theoretical: a cross-default can accelerate the acquisition loan.

Before you take anything, pull the acquisition loan agreement, find the negative covenants section, and read the permitted indebtedness and permitted liens carve-outs. If what you need is not carved out, go back to the acquisition lender first and ask for a waiver or a consent. They will often agree, and they will always be less agreeable after the fact.

What to ask for, what to have ready, what to refuse

Askyour acquisition lender whether they will provide the working capital facility themselves. It is the simplest path — no consent required, no intercreditor issue, and they already know the business.
Have readythe adjustment schedule marked up against actuals, the customer retention numbers, and your trailing statements since close.
Refuseto present the seller's adjusted EBITDA as though it were yours. The lender will normalise it anyway, and being the person who did it first is worth more than the difference in the number.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

The acquisition debt is on the schedule, the seller's add-backs are being tested against reality, and you have no track record of your own yet.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, SBA Loan. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to restaurants?

It is written around how a restaurant business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading