Guide · commercial

Comparing factoring quotes when every factor prices differently

Per 30 days, tiered, flat plus daily — three quotes on the same invoice can rank in three different orders depending on when your customer pays.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Factoring quotes are not standardised, and the headline percentage is close to meaningless on its own. The same invoice under three quotes can produce three different answers, and the cheapest one changes depending on how fast your customers pay.

The four structures you will meet

Flat per period, or part thereof.A percentage for each 30 days, or each 10, 15 or 20 days, rounded up. Day 31 costs the same as day 60 under a 30-day structure. Rounding up is where the money is.
Tiered.A larger charge for an opening window, then a smaller increment for each period after it.
Flat plus daily.A base percentage for an initial window, then a per-day charge. The most granular and the easiest to model.
Prime plus a margin, plus a service fee.Common in larger facilities and in structures that look more like a line. Interest accrues daily on funds employed, and a separate service or administration fee is charged on invoice volume. Two numbers, and you need both.

Three quotes, one invoice

Illustrative only — a $25,000 invoice, and three quotes you might be holding at once. Constructed figures, not market rates.

Quote A: 2.5% for the first 30 days, then 0.05% per day.
Quote B: 1% per 10 days or part thereof.
Quote C: 3% for the first 45 days, then 1% per 15 days or part thereof.

If your customer pays on day 20:A costs 2.5% = $625. B costs 2 periods = 2% = $500. C costs 3% = $750. B is cheapest.
If your customer pays on day 45:A costs 2.5% + 15 days × 0.05% = 3.25% = $812.50. B costs 5 periods = 5% = $1,250. C costs 3% = $750. C is cheapest.
If your customer pays on day 75:A costs 2.5% + 45 days × 0.05% = 4.75% = $1,187.50. B costs 8 periods = 8% = $2,000. C costs 3% + 2 periods = 5% = $1,250. A is cheapest.

Every quote wins somewhere. Nothing about the quotes changed between those three cases — only the payment date. The lowest headline number, B at 1%, is the most expensive of the three at both 45 and 75 days.

The only way to compare them

Use your own aging report. You already have the data.

  1. Pull the last twelve months of paid invoices with issue date and payment date.
  2. Calculate actual days to pay for each. Not your terms — actual.
  3. Build the distribution: what share paid inside 30 days, 31 to 45, 46 to 60, 61 to 90, beyond.
  4. Run each quote's fee formula across that distribution.
  5. Compare the total annual cost in dollars.

This takes an afternoon in a spreadsheet and it is the single most valuable thing you can do before signing a factoring agreement. It also tells you something else worth knowing: which structure penalises your worst-paying customers hardest.

What that calculation looks like when you do it

Illustrative only —suppose your aging shows 20% of invoices paying inside 30 days, 35% between 31 and 45, 30% between 46 and 60, and 15% between 61 and 90, and you would factor $3,000,000 of invoices a year. Take a representative day in each band — 25, 38, 53 and 75 — and run the three quotes above across them.
Quote Acosts 2.5%, 2.9%, 3.65% and 4.75% in the four bands, a weighted 3.32% of face. On $3,000,000 that is $99,675 a year.
Quote Bcosts 3%, 4%, 6% and 8%, a weighted 5.00%. That is $150,000 a year.
Quote Ccosts 3%, 3%, 4% and 5%, a weighted 3.60%. That is $108,000 a year.

The quote with the lowest headline number costs $50,325 a year more than the one with the highest. The distribution did all the work, and the distribution is in a report you already have.

Then run it twice more, once assuming everything pays ten days later and once ten days earlier. If the ranking survives both, you have a real answer. If it flips, you are choosing a bet on your customers rather than a price.

The advance rate changes the denominator

The discount is charged on face value. The cash you get is the advance. A 2% discount at a 90% advance rate is 2% of face against 90 cents of cash — about 2.22% of the money that actually arrived. At an 80% advance it is 2.5% of the cash.

Two quotes with the same discount and different advance rates are not the same price, and the reserve you are waiting on is working capital you do not have until the customer pays. Ask for the advance rate and the discount together, then divide one by the other before you compare anything.

The costs that are not in the headline

Add these to every quote before comparing:

  • Wire and ACH fees, per transaction, multiplied by your funding frequency.
  • Monthly minimum fees, and the volume required to avoid them.
  • Set-up, due diligence or facility fees.
  • Credit check fees per new customer.
  • Lockbox, portal or software fees.
  • Chargeback and rebilling fees.
  • Field exam or audit fees.
  • Early termination fees and the notice period.
  • Same-day funding surcharges.

A quote with a low discount and a monthly minimum you will miss half the year is not a low quote.

Ask for the same worked example from every factor

Send each one identical wording:

"On a $25,000 invoice, advance rate as quoted, please show me in dollars: the amount I receive on day one, every fee charged if my customer pays on day 30, on day 45 and on day 60, and the reserve released in each case."

Three responses in the same format, in dollars, comparable side by side. A factor that will not answer in dollars has told you something about how the relationship will run.

One structural point

Do not compare a factoring quote to a term loan APR without converting both onto the same basis and showing the conversion. A discount charged per invoice has no annual dimension until you attach your own days-to-pay assumption to it. Attach it explicitly, write the assumption down, and then the comparison is honest. Skip that step and you are comparing two numbers that measure different things.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

Per 30 days, tiered, flat plus daily — three quotes on the same invoice can rank in three different orders depending on when your customer pays.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Working Capital, Invoice Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to construction?

It is written around how a construction business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading