Guide · commercial

Sale-leaseback: raising cash against equipment you already own

You sell the machine to a funder and lease it straight back. The cash is real, the tax bill can be too, and the advance is based on a number lower than you think.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

You own the machine outright. It is worth something. A sale-leaseback turns that into working capital without stopping production — you sell the asset to a funder, sign a lease on it the same day, and keep using it.

The mechanics

  1. You identify equipment you own free of liens, or nearly so.
  2. The funder values it, usually by appraisal or by desktop valuation against auction comparables.
  3. The funder buys it for an agreed price and wires you the money.
  4. You sign a lease and start making payments.
  5. At the end, depending on structure, you buy it back for a nominal amount, a fixed amount, or fair market value.

The equipment does not move. Your operations do not change. What changes is that an asset became cash and a monthly obligation.

The valuation, and why the number disappoints

Funders do not lend against what a machine is worth to you in production. They lend against what they could recover if they had to take it and sell it. Three values matter, and they are not close together:

Fair market value in continued use.The highest number. What the asset is worth as part of a working operation.
Orderly liquidation value.What it fetches with a reasonable marketing period, typically at auction, removed and sold.
Forced liquidation value.What it fetches in a hurry. The lowest.

Sale-leaseback pricing runs off the liquidation numbers, and then an advance rate is applied to that.

Illustrative only — a machine with a $110,000 replacement cost is appraised with an orderly liquidation value of $48,000. A funder advancing 70% of orderly liquidation value funds $33,600. If you were expecting a number anchored to what you paid, or to what it would cost to replace, this is where the conversation gets short. The figures are constructed to show the arithmetic, not to describe any funder's policy.

The tax problem nobody mentions in the sales call

If you expensed the equipment when you bought it — section 179, bonus depreciation, or years of regular depreciation — its adjusted basis may be at or near zero. Selling it, even to a funder who leases it straight back, is a sale. Gain up to the amount of depreciation you previously claimed is generally recaptured as ordinary income under Internal Revenue Code section 1245 for equipment.

In plain terms: raising $48,000 against a fully depreciated machine can produce a taxable event in the year you do it. That is not a reason to avoid the transaction. It is a reason to model the tax before you sign, because the point of the exercise was cash, and an unplanned tax bill undoes some of it.

Talk to your CPA first. Bring the draft documents.

Where a sale-leaseback earns its place

Bridging a genuine timing gap.A big contract needs working capital, the equipment is idle capital, and the cost of the money is less than the margin on the work.
Cheaper than the alternative.Compared with short-term unsecured money, secured cash against a hard asset is usually less expensive. Compared with a bank line you could actually get, it usually is not.
Reversing a cash purchase.Some funders will do a sale-leaseback on equipment you bought with cash recently, effectively financing a purchase after the fact. Appetite for this varies with how recent the purchase is; some will only look at assets bought within the last few months, others will fund older equipment at a lower advance. Both exist. Ask.

Where it goes wrong

Using it to service other debt.If the reason you need the cash is that existing payments are unaffordable, adding another monthly payment secured by your production equipment makes the next problem worse and puts the machines inside it.
Not reading the lease.A sale-leaseback is a lease. Hell-or-high-water language, insurance obligations, end-of-term notice, return conditions and default remedies all apply, and now they apply to equipment you used to own outright.
Missing a lien.If a bank has a blanket UCC filing covering all business assets, your equipment is already encumbered even if you never borrowed specifically against it. The sale-leaseback funder will need that lien released or subordinated, and your bank has to agree. Find this out in week one, not week four.
Ignoring what it does to your borrowing base.If you have an asset-based line that counts equipment, selling the equipment shrinks the base. You can raise cash on one side and lose availability on the other.

Price it as a total, not as a payment

Illustrative only —continuing the machine above, the funder advances $33,600 on a 36-month lease at $1,180 a month with a $1 buyout. The total of payments is $42,481. The cost of the money is $8,881, and the rate implied by that cash flow is about 1.33% a month, roughly 15.9% annualised.

Those are the three figures to extract from any sale-leaseback proposal: cash to you, total of payments including the buyout, and the rate connecting them. A monthly payment on its own compares nothing, because the term is the other half of the price and it is the half the proposal is quietest about.

Check your existing loan documents first

A sale-leaseback is a sale. Most bank loan agreements carry a negative covenant restricting the sale or disposal of assets outside the ordinary course of business, and many restrict sale-leaseback transactions by name. Equipment finance agreements frequently do the same for the specific asset.

So the sequence is: read the covenants in every facility you already have, work out who has to consent, and ask them before signing anything with the new funder. A transaction that cures a cash problem and triggers a default in a cheaper facility has made the position worse, and the consent request is one email.

Questions to ask before you start

  • What valuation method are you using, and will I see the appraisal?
  • What is the advance rate against that valuation?
  • Is this a true lease or a conditional sale, and what is the end-of-term buyout?
  • What is the total of all payments plus the buyout, in dollars?
  • What lien releases do you need, and from whom?
  • Are there prepayment terms if I want to buy the equipment back early?

That last one matters if the cash need is short-term. A facility you cannot exit for three years is not a bridge.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

You sell the machine to a funder and lease it straight back. The cash is real, the tax bill can be too, and the advance is based on a number lower than you think.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Working Capital, Equipment Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to construction?

It is written around how a construction business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading