Reconciliation: the clause that decides what happens in a bad month
It is the single most important paragraph in a merchant cash advance agreement, it is usually conditional, and most owners find out how it works only after they needed it.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
Reconciliation is the mechanism that is supposed to reconnect what leaves your account to what your business actually took in. When it works, a bad month costs you time rather than an overdraft. When it does not work, a bad month becomes a default. It is worth more attention than the factor rate.
What the clause is meant to do
The agreement entitles the funder to a specified percentage of receipts, but collects a fixed estimated amount. Reconciliation is the true-up. Over some defined period — a month, a fortnight, a calendar quarter — actual receipts are measured, the correct percentage is calculated, and the difference is either refunded to you, credited against future remittances, or used to reset the daily amount going forward.
Reconciliation does not reduce what you owe. The purchased amount is unchanged. What changes is the pace. A successful reconciliation stretches the deal out, which lowers the pressure on cash and raises the effective cost per month of nothing at all, because the dollar cost was fixed at the start.
The two shapes it comes in
What a reconciliation request actually has to contain
Read your own clause first; it governs. But a request that satisfies most drafting looks like this:
- A clear statement of what you are invoking. Name the section number and say you are requesting reconciliation of remittances for a stated period. Do not call it a hardship request, a modification, or a payment plan. Those are different things and they get routed to a different desk.
- The period covered. Exact dates, matching the period the contract defines.
- Actual receipts for that period. Bank statements for every account into which receipts are deposited, and card processor statements if the deal is card-based. Complete statements, not screenshots of balances.
- The arithmetic. Actual receipts multiplied by the specified percentage, set against the total actually debited in the period, and the resulting difference. Show it. Do not make the servicer derive it.
- What you are asking for. A refund of the excess, a credit, a reset of the daily amount to a stated figure, or a combination. Be specific.
- A signature from an authorised person, and the business and account details the contract requires.
Send it by whatever method the notice clause specifies — often that means a particular email address, or certified mail to a named address, and often "the address on the signature page" is not the address on the servicer's emails. Send it to both if in doubt. Keep the delivery receipt.
Timing, and why it is unforgiving
Many clauses require the request within a short window after the period closes. Miss the window and the right for that period is typically gone, even though nothing about your finances has changed. Diary the deadline on the day you fund, not on the day you get into trouble.
Also check the "not in default" condition. If a bounced debit has already put you technically in default, a reconciliation right conditioned on being current may be unavailable at exactly the moment it matters. That sequencing trap is the reason to reconcile early — after the first bad month, not the third.
If the request is ignored or refused
Put the second request in writing, reference the first by date, and ask for the specific contractual basis of any refusal. Keep everything.
There are two reasons for the paper trail. The practical one is that servicers respond to files that look organised, and a documented request with the arithmetic already done is cheaper for them to grant than to fight. The legal one is that a funder's actual handling of reconciliation is one of the things courts have looked at when asked whether a particular agreement functioned as a purchase or as something else. That question is fact-specific and jurisdiction-specific and no one can promise you an outcome, but the record you build now is the record a lawyer would work from later.
What reconciliation will not do for you
- It will not forgive any part of the purchased amount.
- It will not lower the total dollar cost of the deal. The cost was fixed at signing.
- It will not stop other positions, if you have taken more than one. Each contract reconciles on its own terms, if at all.
- It will not usually help retroactively beyond the period it covers.
Reconciliation is a pressure valve, not a discount. Used early and in writing, it is the difference between a slow quarter and a default. Left in the drawer, it is a paragraph you paid for and never used.
The arithmetic, worked
Illustrative only — your specified percentage is 12%. Over a defined period of 21 collection days your actual receipts were $84,000, so the funder was entitled to $10,080. It debited $520 a day, which is $10,920. The excess is $840.
Going forward, 12% of $84,000 across 21 days is $480 a day, and that is the reset figure you are asking for.
Put exactly those five numbers in the request: receipts, percentage, entitlement, amount actually debited, difference — then the new daily figure you want and the date you want it from. A servicer who has to derive that from a bundle of statements will take longer over it and is likelier to find a reason not to.
Attach the statements the arithmetic came from, and say which pages the figures are on.
Where this applies
Related questions
What does this guide cover?
It is the single most important paragraph in a merchant cash advance agreement, it is usually conditional, and most owners find out how it works only after they needed it.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Merchant Cash Advance, Revenue-Based Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Are the figures here quotes?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.