Guide · informational

The security agreement, and what a lien on all assets actually reaches

One document gives the creditor rights. A different document tells the world about them. Owners routinely read neither, then discover the difference at the worst moment.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Two separate pieces of paper are involved and they do different jobs. The security agreement is the contract in which you grant a security interest — it creates the rights. The UCC-1 financing statement is a short public notice filed with a state office — it makes those rights effective against other creditors and visible to anyone who searches. A funder can have one without the other, and the consequences differ.

Both operate under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in your state. The uniform text is published by Cornell's Legal Information Institute at law.cornell.edu/ucc/9. Your state's enacted version controls, and states vary in places.

The granting clause

One sentence, usually beginning "Debtor hereby grants to Secured Party a continuing security interest in", followed by a list. Everything that follows the word "in" is what you have pledged. Read the list slowly.

A quirk worth knowing: a supergeneric description such as "all assets" is enough in the financing statement under §9-504, but the security agreement itself needs a description that reasonably identifies the collateral under §9-108. So the filing you find online may say less, or more, than the document you signed. Compare the two.

After-acquired property and proceeds

Most granting clauses cover property you do not own yet. Under §9-204 a security agreement may reach after-acquired collateral, which means the equipment you buy next year and the invoices you have not issued yet fall under the same lien. Proceeds are covered too: sell a pledged asset and the money, the trade-in, and the insurance payout are generally proceeds of the original collateral.

This is why "all business assets" is not a snapshot. It is a standing claim over the category.

What a blanket lien does and does not reach

Accounts and receivables.Squarely covered when listed. After default, §9-607 permits a secured party to notify your customers to pay it directly. No court order is required for that step; the right comes from the agreement and the statute.
Equipment and inventory.Covered when listed. After default, §9-609 allows the secured party to take possession, including without a court order if it can be done without a breach of the peace. Titled vehicles are usually a separate mechanic, perfected through the certificate of title rather than a UCC filing.
Deposit accounts.Listing them is not the end of it. Perfection in a deposit account as original collateral is generally by control under §9-104 — the creditor is the bank, or there is a control agreement with your bank. Absent that, a lien over "all assets" does not by itself let a funder reach into your bank account.
Real property.Outside Article 9. A lien on business assets does not touch land or buildings. A mortgage or deed of trust is a separate document you would have signed knowingly.
Commercial tort claims.A description by type alone is not sufficient under §9-108(e); these require specific description, so a generic clause usually does not sweep in a lawsuit you might bring.

The covenants hiding inside

Security agreements carry obligations beyond the grant. Typically: keep the collateral insured and name the secured party; do not grant another lien on the same collateral (the negative pledge); do not sell collateral outside the ordinary course; keep records and permit inspection; sign further documents on request. Breach of any of these is usually an event of default in the main agreement even if every payment has cleared.

Reading your own granting clause

Take the agreement and do this line by line. It takes ten minutes and it is the only way to know what you signed.

  1. Find the sentence beginning "grants" and mark where the list starts and where it ends. Everything between those two points is pledged.
  2. Circle every defined term inside the list — "Accounts", "Equipment", "General Intangibles", "Investment Property". Each is defined in Article 9 or in the agreement, and more broadly than the word suggests. "General intangibles" reaches things most owners would never call assets: customer lists, software licences, goodwill, transferable permits.
  3. Look for "now owned or hereafter acquired" and for "proceeds". Both are usually there. Both extend the lien forward in time.
  4. Check whether deposit accounts are named, and then check separately whether a control agreement is being signed. The first without the second reaches much less than it appears to.
  5. Write down, in your own words, what is left unencumbered. On a standard all-assets grant the answer is usually: real property, and anything specifically excluded.

That last line is the one to keep. It is what you have available to offer the next lender.

What it costs you with the next lender

A first-position blanket filing is visible to every underwriter who searches your name. Many lenders will not take a junior position on the same collateral, so the practical effect is that your next financing conversation starts with a subordination or payoff question. That is not a legal consequence of the lien; it is a commercial one, and it is the one owners feel first.

Before you sign, three checks

  1. Read the granting clause aloud and list what it covers in plain words.
  2. Ask whether the funder will file a UCC-1, on what collateral description, and whether it will accept a description narrower than all assets.
  3. Ask what it takes to get a termination filed after payoff, and get the answer in the document rather than in an email.

The exclusions worth asking for

Not every grant has to be total, and narrower descriptions are more often available than owners assume — particularly where the financing is for a specific purpose.

A purchase-money carve-out.If you intend to finance equipment later, ask for language permitting purchase-money security interests in future equipment. Without it, the negative pledge blocks the vehicle or machine you buy next year even though the current funder is not financing it.
A specific asset rather than everything.On an equipment deal, a lien on that equipment is the natural scope. An all-assets filing on a single machine purchase is a commercial choice, not a legal necessity, and it can be negotiated before signing and almost never after.
Deposit accounts.Excluding them, or declining a control agreement, is worth asking about — a control agreement gives the secured party a direct route to your operating cash.

Getting the lien off again

The third check above is worth expanding, because termination is the step everyone forgets and everyone later needs. The document should state how many days after payoff the funder files a UCC-3, and who bears the cost.

After payoff, do not assume. Search the filing office yourself two or three weeks later, and if the filing is still open, write to the secured party at the address on the financing statement. Article 9 provides a mechanism for compelling termination in defined circumstances, and a written request is the first step of it. A stale filing is not a problem until the day you need to borrow, at which point it is an urgent one.

This is a description of mechanisms, not legal advice. Article 9 is enacted state by state and your agreement's wording controls how it applies to you, so a lawyer licensed in your state is the person to review both.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

One document gives the creditor rights. A different document tells the world about them. Owners routinely read neither, then discover the difference at the worst moment.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Invoice Financing, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Are the figures here quotes?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading