Guide · informational

Sizing the cash trough on a seasonal inventory build

Build the month-by-month cash line before you choose a product. The depth and the date of the low point decide everything that follows.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

Seasonal borrowing goes wrong in a specific way: the owner knows roughly how much stock they need to buy and borrows roughly that amount. The amount of stock and the amount of cash required are different numbers, arriving on different dates, and the gap between them is where the facility is either right-sized or badly wrong.

What you need is a month-by-month cash line with the trough marked on it. It takes an hour.

Build the line

Four inputs, by month, for a full cycle plus two months either side:

  1. Cash out for goods, dated when you actually pay, not when you order or receive. Supplier terms move this by 30 or 60 days and the movement is the point.
  2. Cash in from sales, split by how it settles. Card sales land in days. Trade accounts land on terms and some land late.
  3. Fixed operating cash out — rent, payroll, utilities, insurance, existing debt service. This continues whether or not it is the season.
  4. Opening cash, and any minimum operating balance you cannot go below.

A worked cycle

Illustrative only —a retailer with a fourth-quarter season. Opening cash 68,000, fixed costs 46,000 a month, 72 per cent of sales settling in-month and 28 per cent the following month. Goods are bought on 30-day terms, so June's order is paid in July.

Goods received: June nothing, July 60,000, August 96,000, September 74,000, October 12,000, November 8,000.

Sales: June 52,000, July 58,000, August 61,000, September 84,000, October 126,000, November 214,000, December 297,000, January 96,000.

The cash balance runs:

  • June: 59,440
  • July: 69,760
  • August: 23,920
  • September: -40,520
  • October: -46,280
  • November: 85,080
  • December: 304,840
  • January: 411,120

The trough is October at -46,280. Total seasonal purchases are 250,000.

Three things fall out of that, and none of them is obvious from the purchase total.

The financing requirement is 46,280, not 250,000.The business self-funds most of the build from ongoing trading. Borrowing 250,000 would mean paying for 200,000 of money you never needed, and if the product prices by total repayment rather than by time, that error is permanent — you cannot give the money back.
The trough is in October, a month after the last big payment.It is the collection lag on September and October sales that produces the low point, not the purchase itself. If you had sized a facility to peak stock in August, you would have drawn at the wrong time.
The recovery is violent.By December the account holds 304,840. Any facility with a minimum term, an early termination fee or a fixed total repayment is being paid for through months when the money is sitting idle.

Sizing the facility

Take the trough, add a cushion, and round up. At 25 per cent, 46,280 becomes 57,850, so a 60,000 line.

The cushion is not optional. Everything in the model that can move, moves against you in the same direction: sales arrive later than planned, collections stretch, and the supplier who offered 30 days wants a deposit this year. A 25 per cent cushion on the trough is a starting point; if last year's actuals differed from the plan by more than that, use your own error rate.

Then choose the product shape, and let the shape of the trough choose it:

  • A revolving line fits, because the requirement rises and falls. You draw in September, repay in December, and pay for the period you used it. Check the unused line fee and draw fees, and check for a clean-up period requiring a zero balance for a stretch each year — with this cash shape, a clean-up requirement in January is easy to meet and one in September is not.
  • A term loan fits badly. You take the full amount in month one, pay interest on all of it for the whole term, and still have the money in December when you do not need it.
  • A fixed-total-repayment product fits worst. The cost does not fall when the cash comes back early, so the December surplus buys you nothing.

The two numbers to track after you draw

Actual against forecast, by month, in the same format.One column for the plan, one for what happened, a difference column. When a month misses by more than your cushion, you know in that month rather than in the month you run out.
Days of cover.Cash on hand plus undrawn availability, divided by average daily cash outflow. Under 30 days during a build, stop buying. This is the number that tells you a season is going wrong while there is still something to do about it.

What to do with the model

  1. Build the line for the coming cycle before you place a single seasonal order.
  2. Mark the trough month and the trough amount, and put both in the credit application. A lender reading a specific dated requirement responds differently from one reading "we need 250,000 for inventory".
  3. Ask for availability that covers the trough plus your cushion, and for a facility you can repay without penalty when the season turns.
  4. Rerun the model with sales 15 per cent lower and collections 15 days slower. If the trough doubles, arrange more availability now, while the numbers still look good.
  5. Agree the markdown dates in advance for anything unsold by a set date, and model the cash those markdowns produce.

Borrowing against a season you have run before is one of the more defensible reasons to take on debt. It stops being defensible the moment the amount is set by the size of the order rather than by the depth of the hole.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

Build the month-by-month cash line before you choose a product. The depth and the date of the low point decide everything that follows.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, Asset-Based Lending. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to retail?

It is written around how a retail business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading