Guide · informational

Small business funding in Arizona: a loan guarantee, no disclosure rule, and a construction-heavy borrower base

Arizona's commerce authority guarantees bank loans rather than making them, and nothing in state law requires a funder to show you the cost.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

The Arizona Commerce Authority does not write cheques to small businesses. Its capital programmes are structured to make a bank more comfortable, and the bank is still the one deciding. As of 2026 the approved set under the federal State Small Business Credit Initiative includes an Arizona Loan Guarantee Program plus two venture programmes: a multi-fund venture programme and a venture co-invest programme. The loan guarantee is the one that matters to an operating business with a bank relationship; the venture programmes are for equity-track companies. Current details sit with the Arizona Commerce Authority.

If you are looking for a state grant for working capital, that is not what these are.

Arizona requires no cost disclosure on commercial financing

Arizona has not enacted a commercial financing disclosure law. As of 2026 a short list of states requires funders to hand business borrowers a standardised cost sheet; Arizona is not on it. There is also no Arizona registration regime for commercial finance brokers.

So the honest statement is this: no disclosure sheet is coming, and nobody is obliged to produce one. If you want to know what a deal costs, you have to demand the numbers and get them in writing before signing.

The two figures that resolve almost every confusing offer:

  1. Total dollars you receive, net of any fee deducted at funding.
  2. Total dollars you repay, including every fee.

Everything else — factor rate, "rate", "cost of capital", buy rate — is a way of describing the gap between those two numbers, sometimes clearly and sometimes not. A factor rate has no time dimension. Turning one into an annualised figure requires the term, and the conversion has to be shown, not asserted.

What Arizona's small business base means in practice

The SBA Office of Advocacy counts 706,640 small businesses in Arizona, 99.5 percent of the state's businesses, employing 42.6 percent of its workers. Small-business employment is led by health care and social assistance (about 194,000), accommodation and food services (about 174,000) and construction (about 150,000), followed by professional, scientific and technical services and retail trade.

Construction at that scale shapes the local funding market more than anything else. Contractors have three recurring cash problems, and each has a product that fits and several that do not:

Equipment.A machine that will earn for seven years should not be paid for out of a nine-month advance. Equipment finance or a term loan matched to the asset's working life is the fit. Watch for soft costs — delivery, installation, training — and whether they are financed or expected in cash.
Progress billing.Money is spent on labour and materials long before the draw arrives. That is a receivables gap, and the fitted products are a line of credit or invoice factoring, not a daily-debit advance sized against deposits that arrive in lumps.
Retention.Held-back percentages sit unpaid for months after completion. Financing retention as if it were current revenue is how firms end up refinancing their own growth.

Restaurants and retailers, the other large blocks, get sold merchant cash advances hardest because card volume is easy for a funder to verify. That verification convenience is a reason the product is offered, not a reason it is priced well.

Checking liens filed against your Arizona business

UCC financing statements against business personal property are filed centrally with the Arizona Secretary of State, which maintains a searchable index. Search your own exact legal entity name before you apply anywhere.

You are looking for three things: an active blanket filing from a funder you have already repaid, a filing you do not recognise, and the order of filings if there is more than one. Priority runs by filing order, and if a second funder is behind a blanket first-position filing, the second deal will be priced for that or declined. A satisfied obligation that still shows an open filing needs a UCC-3 termination from the secured party — ask for it in writing.

Illustrative only — doing the disclosure Arizona does not require

Since nothing standardised is coming, here is the whole calculation on one offer.

Illustrative only —$75,000 offered at a 1.38 factor with 5% deducted at funding. You receive $71,250. You repay $103,500. The cost is $28,500 against a headline that says 38%.

Divide the repayment by the cash received: $103,500 over $71,250 is 1.4526. The cost is 45.3% of the money that reached your account.

Then supply the term, which the offer will not. Over six months the payments are $17,250, implying 11.84% a month and 142.0% annualised. Over twelve months they are $8,625, implying 6.27% a month and 75.2% annualised.

One factor, one fee, two prices that differ by nearly half. Everything else on an Arizona offer sheet is commentary until you have the duration, and the duration is the number funders are least willing to commit to in writing.

Checking the entity record too

While you are at the Secretary of State for the UCC search, check the corporate record as well. In Arizona, corporations and LLCs are registered with the Arizona Corporation Commission rather than the Secretary of State, so that is a second search in a second place. Confirm the entity shows as active and in good standing, that the annual report position is current, and that the statutory agent's address still receives mail. A certificate of good standing is inexpensive, it is a standard closing condition on bank and SBA deals, and pulling it in advance removes a condition before anyone can be surprised by it.

The federal layer

SBA 7(a) and 504 loans are available to Arizona businesses through participating lenders and remain the cheapest structured debt most will qualify for. The programmes are federal, so nothing about Arizona law changes them. Start at sba.gov.

Federal adverse-action rules under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act can entitle you to the specific reasons for a decline. If you are turned down, ask.

The checklist before signature

  • Total funded and total repayment, in dollars.
  • Payment amount, frequency and number.
  • Fees outside the headline: origination, ACH, NSF, late, servicing, early termination.
  • Whether the UCC-1 is blanket or specific.
  • Personal guarantee: present or not, payment or performance.
  • Governing law and venue. A funder based elsewhere will often specify its own state's courts.
  • For any daily or weekly debit: whether a reconciliation right exists in writing, and how to invoke it.

None of this is guaranteed to you by Arizona law. All of it is available if you ask before you sign and refuse to proceed without it.

This is general information, not legal advice.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

Arizona's commerce authority guarantees bank loans rather than making them, and nothing in state law requires a funder to show you the cost.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, SBA Loan, Equipment Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Does this apply in Arizona?

This piece is written about Arizona specifically. Rules on disclosure, broker registration and lender licensing are set at state level and change, so confirm the current position with the state agency named on the Arizona page before relying on it.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading