Guide · informational

The capital stack for a second location, layer by layer

Six sources of money, in the order a lender expects to see them, and the one that arrives four months after you have already spent it.

Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.

The number most owners carry around for a second site is the contractor's quote. That number is usually under half the money that leaves the bank account before the new location covers its own costs. The rest is equipment, deposits, permits, pre-opening payroll, opening inventory, and the months of operating loss between the doors opening and the day revenue covers fixed costs.

A capital stack is just the list of who funds which part. Lenders think in these layers because each layer has different collateral behind it and a different willingness to be repaid last. If you present a second-location request as one number and one ask, you are asking a single lender to take every kind of risk in the project at once, and the answer to that is usually no.

The layers, in the order they are underwritten

Owner cash.Goes in first and gets repaid last. On an acquisition or expansion loan the lender is looking for real money that came from outside the business and is not itself borrowed. If you are using an SBA product, the definition is specific enough to be worth reading before you plan around it — see what counts as equity injection.
Landlord contribution.A tenant improvement allowance is part of your funding, but it is reimbursement, not a draw. You build first and get paid after.
Equipment finance.The cleanest layer, because there is a machine behind it. A lender advancing against titled or serial-numbered equipment has something to repossess, so the advance rate is high and the term matches the asset.
Senior term debt.Funds the part with no liquidation value: leasehold improvements, soft costs, goodwill if you bought the site. This layer carries the personal guarantee and usually a blanket lien across both locations.
Working capital facility.A line for the swing between opening and stability. Hardest to get at the moment you need it, because a line is underwritten on trading history and the new site has none.
Seller, landlord or subordinated money.Anything that agrees to wait. It counts as capital to the senior lender only if it is genuinely on standby.

What the project actually costs

Illustrative only —a second site with these figures:
  • Build-out hard costs: 186,000
  • Furniture, fixtures and equipment: 94,000
  • Soft costs, permits, design, deposits: 28,000
  • Opening inventory: 22,000
  • Pre-opening payroll and training: 31,000
  • Working capital reserve: 45,000

Total 406,000. The contractor's quote was 186,000, which is 46 per cent of the project.

Now the stack. Landlord allowance 55,000. Equipment finance at 90 per cent of the FF&E line, 84,600. Owner cash 60,000. That leaves 206,400 for senior term debt.

At an illustrative 9.5 per cent over 60 months, the equipment payment is 1,776.76 a month. At an illustrative 8.5 per cent over 120 months, the term payment is 2,559.06. Combined monthly debt service is 4,335.82, or 52,030 a year — before the new site sells anything.

Owner cash is 14.8 per cent of the project. Add the landlord allowance and 28.3 per cent of the cost is covered by money that is not senior debt. That ratio is what a credit committee reads first.

The timing problem the stack hides

The allowance is 55,000 of your funding and it will not arrive until the work is complete, the lien waivers are signed, the certificate of occupancy is issued and the landlord's payment terms have run. Four and a half months is unremarkable. Carrying 55,000 for that long on a line at an illustrative 11 per cent costs about 2,269 — small. Not having 55,000 available in month three is not small.

Three of the six layers have this shape. Equipment finance funds on delivery and acceptance, not on the deposit the vendor wants at order. Term debt funds at closing, which can be after your contractor's mobilisation payment. The working capital line, if you get one, funds last of all.

So build two schedules: a sources-and-uses table showing who pays for what, and a week-by-week cash calendar showing when each source actually lands against when each bill is due. The gap between them is the bridge you have to fund yourself, and it is the number that gets missed.

Where the stack usually breaks

  • The equipment layer gets absorbed into the term loan. You pay for a fryer over ten years, and the fryer dies in year seven. Match term to asset life, layer by layer.
  • The working capital reserve gets cut to make the deal fit. It is the only line with no invoice attached, so it is the easiest to delete. It is also the line that keeps you from taking an expensive short-term advance in month four.
  • Pre-opening payroll is underestimated. Training a full crew before the first customer walks in is real payroll with real withholding.
  • Soft costs are excluded by the equipment funder. Freight, installation, rigging and warranty may or may not be fundable — see financing soft costs on equipment.
  • The first location's debt service is ignored in the coverage test. The lender combines both. You should too.

What to have ready and what to ask for

  1. A sources-and-uses schedule where uses total the whole project, not the construction quote.
  2. A week-by-week cash calendar from lease signature to month six after opening.
  3. Contractor bid, equipment quotes, and the executed lease with the allowance terms highlighted — the reimbursement conditions and the payment window specifically.
  4. Twelve months of statements and financials for the existing location, plus a projection for the new one that you can defend line by line.
  5. A request for an interest-only or deferred-payment period on the term debt that runs to the end of your ramp, not to the opening date.
  6. Written confirmation of whether the lender will file against both entities and both locations, and whether the existing location's lender has an anti-stacking or additional-indebtedness clause you are about to breach.

Ask each funder which layer they are willing to sit in and whether they will subordinate to, or accept, the others. A funder who will not answer that question in writing is not going to be a workable part of a stack.

Where this applies

Related questions

What does this guide cover?

Six sources of money, in the order a lender expects to see them, and the one that arrives four months after you have already spent it.

Which funding products does this apply to?

Term Loan, Business Line of Credit, SBA Loan, Equipment Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.

Is this specific to restaurants?

It is written around how a restaurant business actually generates and collects cash, which is what makes its funding problem different. The mechanics transfer; the arithmetic may not.

Who writes this?

The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.

How do I know a figure here is right?

Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.

Are the examples real deals?

No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.

Why do you never say what a typical rate is?

Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.

Is this financial or legal advice?

No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.

Can I reuse this content?

Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.

Related reading