Find Me Funders
What is an ISO, and how is it different from a funder or a lender?
Four words get used interchangeably by people who know exactly how they differ. Here is who is who, and whose money is at risk.
Drafted with AI assistance. Not yet independently checked. Nobody has verified the claims on this page against a source, so treat the figures and legal points as a starting point rather than as settled, and confirm anything you are about to act on. How we check things.
What is an ISO in business funding?
An ISO — independent sales organisation — is a sales office that originates deals for funders under an ISO agreement and is paid a commission at funding. It does not use its own money. A funder or lender is the party whose capital is actually at risk: a funder purchases future receivables under an advance, a lender makes a loan. A syndicator is an investor who buys a slice of someone else's deal. Knowing which one you are speaking to tells you who can actually commit to a price.
The four roles
Who you are actually talking to
Most first calls come from an ISO or a broker, not from the party whose money you will receive. That is the normal structure of the market rather than a deception. It becomes a problem only when it is concealed, because it changes what the person on the phone can actually do.
An ISO can package, place and advocate. It cannot approve, cannot set the price by itself in most arrangements, and cannot commit to a funding date. When someone says "we can get this approved today", ask who "we" is.
Why it matters to you
Illustrative only — where the spread lives
The commission is not a separate line item you will see. It is the gap between two numbers, only one of which you are shown.
Widen it. A 1.30 buy rate sold at 1.49 on the same $50,000 means the funder's number is $65,000 and yours is $74,500. The spread is $9,500, which is 39% of your $24,500 cost.
Separately, and on top, an origination fee expressed in points is frequently taken at funding — four points on $50,000 is $2,000 deducted from the wire, so $48,000 arrives against a $74,500 obligation.
None of this is hidden in the sense of being unlawful, and an intermediary that finds you a funder nobody else would have reached has earned something. It is hidden in the sense that no document shows you the buy rate. What you can do is ask two questions that a direct funder answers instantly and an intermediary usually does not: is there a buy rate behind this price, and what are you paid on this deal?
How to establish which you are dealing with
Ask directly: are you the funder, or are you submitting my file to funders? Then check it. The entity on the contract, the secured party on the UCC filing and the originator of the wire tell you the truth regardless of the answer.
There is nothing wrong with using an intermediary — a good one earns their commission by knowing which funders will approve your file. The full picture is in what a funding broker actually does, and the practical test is in how to tell a direct funder from a broker.
Where the syndicator changes your position
A syndicated deal looks identical to you. One agreement, one funder named, one debit. Underneath, several parties own slices of your obligation and of every dollar you deliver.
Two consequences worth knowing. Decisions can be slower, because a reconciliation request, a modification, a settlement or a payment plan may need agreement among participants rather than one credit officer. And where your broker has syndicated into the deal, that broker has money at risk in your file as well as commission on it — which aligns them with the funder's collection interest in a way you were probably not told about.
Neither is a reason to avoid a deal. Both are a reason to ask, before signing, who has authority to agree a change to the payment schedule and how long that takes.
Two brokers, one file
The ISO agreement between the intermediary and the funder usually contains a deal-protection rule: the first submission of a given business, within a stated window, belongs to the ISO that sent it. That rule exists to stop brokers competing over the same merchant, and it produces a problem that lands on you.
If two brokers submit your file to the same funder, the funder will often decline or shelve the second submission rather than arbitrate, and it will not necessarily tell you why. You experience an unexplained decline from a funder that would have approved you, and the only fix is time.
So before any file moves, ask each broker to name the funders they intend to submit to, and tell each one who else has your file. A broker that will not give names cannot be kept out of another broker's lane, and shopping a deal through three intermediaries at once is the fastest way to burn the funders who would have said yes.
What to ask, and what to refuse
Ask for the funders' names before your file is submitted anywhere, and ask how many will receive it. Ask whether the person on the phone is paid by you, by the funder, or both. Ask who you contact after funding, by name and at which company, because it will not be the salesperson.
Refuse to send bank statements, tax returns or a Social Security number to a party you cannot identify on a state registry. Refuse a submission to "our network" without a list. And refuse any fee charged before an approval exists — legitimate application, documentation and filing charges appear in the documents and are not collected on a promise.
Where this applies
Related questions
What is an ISO in business funding?
An ISO — independent sales organisation — is a sales office that originates deals for funders under an ISO agreement and is paid a commission at funding. It does not use its own money. A funder or lender is the party whose capital is actually at risk: a funder purchases future receivables under an advance, a lender makes a loan. A syndicator is an investor who buys a slice of someone else's deal. Knowing which one you are speaking to tells you who can actually commit to a price.
Which funding products does this apply to?
Merchant Cash Advance, Working Capital, Term Loan, Revenue-Based Financing. Each has its own page listing the funders in this directory that offer it and what each one publishes about its terms.
Are the figures here quotes?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What a particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it at all.
Who writes this?
The Find Me Funders research desk. Some drafting is AI-assisted, and every page that is says so at the top, including whether a person has checked its claims yet.
How do I know a figure here is right?
Where a page carries the green notice, its claims were checked against the sources listed at the end and a reviewer is named. Where it carries the amber one, nobody has verified it yet and you should confirm anything you plan to act on.
Are the examples real deals?
No. Every worked example is labelled illustrative and exists to show the arithmetic. What any particular lender charges is on that lender's page, where it publishes it.
Why do you never say what a typical rate is?
Because we cannot source it. A market average assembled from lenders who do not publish prices is a guess with a decimal point on it. Where a lender publishes a figure, we show that figure and say where it came from.
Is this financial or legal advice?
No. It is general information about how these products work. Outcomes depend on your contract and your state, and a lawyer or accountant licensed where you are is the person to ask about your situation.
Can I reuse this content?
Quote a paragraph with a link back. Do not republish whole articles.